:: Contact Us :: Affiliates :: Links & Resources
 
 :: Mainland Media :: Workers :: Working Conditions :: ACFTU and Trade Unions :: Society and Welfare :: Globalisation :: Industries :: Strikes

Working Conditions

The Truth behind the Gems

Interview with Yang Renping (Lucky Gems) and Feng Xingzhong (Ko Ngar Factory)

15 December 2005

In December 2005 two silicosis affected workers from the jewellery industry came to Hong Kong to meet with unions and NGOs and to highlight their struggle for compensation and official acknowledgment of their plight. IHLO managed to talk to these two of the most outspoken and brave workers. This is a translation of the interview. More details about the two men appear at the bottom of the interview.

[For more information on the cases of these jewellery workers please click here]

What have you been doing since the first time you came to Hong Kong to protest in February 2005?
Yang: After I got my compensation, I rented a small place in Shenzhen with my friends and we also travel - if our health allows it - to factories in the area to talk with other workers, mainly about work safety issues.

What kind of factories have you visited?
All sorts. We are most familiar with jewellery factories, but we have also been to battery factories, shoe, metal and toy factories. Battery workers deal with potassium, lead and phenyl; the metal workshops produce lot of copper and iron dust which is very hazardous; toy factories use paints and the shoe workers are exposed to those harmful glue. We have been in touch with about 70 workers, apart from some hundred workers from two GP battery factories.

Was there a trade union at your previous workplace?
No, there isn’t even one now! [Lucky Jewellery has a workforce of 3,000 and Ko Ngar 700 workers, respectively. Ed].
Yang: When we fell sick, we sent 25 workers’ representatives to Beijing in May 2004 and they visited the Letters and Complaints Office and also the ACFTU. The ACFTU told them that they should visit Ministry of Labour and Social Security instead of them.

What do ordinary migrant workers think about the ACFTU?
Hmm… they either don’t know what ACFTU does or they are disappointed by what it does. When we were workers, we knew the ACFTU existed but it had nothing to do with us. Then after the time it turned us away in Beijing when we went there to seek help, we realized that it was not helpful at all.

Is it a problem that the ACFTU is not functioning as it should be?
Yes. At the moment, in most of the factories, workers and the employers have no channel to communicate, and in fact, many problems could be solved if both parties have a chance to talk and sort things out. Now workers have no option but to keep their discontentment hidden until they can’t bear it anymore and it usually ends in an industrial action, but we think, if there is a union to talk on behalf of the workers, it could make a difference and make both sides’ life easy.

Have you encountered workers who proactively call for the formation of a union?
Not really. We think one reason for this is because workers might be aware of their own rights but they have not yet developed the idea of sticking together to fight for their rights. The other reason is that they don’t know how a union works - we mean an independent trade union. Inside China, we have too little access to information about what the outside world, especially the labour movement, is like. It is just too difficult for a Chinese worker to imagine. Once a member of staff from a Hong Kong labour NGO visited us and one of the workers asked him; “are you a triad member?” That worker thought that the idea of sticking together to demand something is what a triad does.

Yang, can you tell me why you choose to stay in Guangdong to work with other workers after you got your compensation? And Feng, why are you doing this work when you have all sorts of other problems to face [Feng Xingzhong has not yet received any compensation and has an aged mother to care for in Sichuan Province]
Well, we don’t want to have the mindset that we are sick and therefore we are not able to contribute. First of all - you know its like a psychological therapy for ourselves when we help others. Secondly, we see what we do as a long-term struggle, to remind the local factories that besides making money, they should also listen to the voice of the migrant workers’ both inside and outside their factories. Because we see it as a long term struggle, we try to be optimistic, cheerful and take good care of ourselves, so we may live longer to see if our work brings about any results.

What do you think foreign NGOs, media or trade unions can contribute to this struggle?
In terms of the media - they should pay more attention to the living conditions of Chinese workers’ and they should in particular visit factories unannounced. You know that auditing firms and labour inspectors usually give the factory notice days before the inspection and the factory has enough time to clean up the factory, hide some workers to make the workplace look more spacious and give the children a day off.

Children? Are you saying factories employ children?
Many of the jewellery factories take young people from the ages of 12 to 15.

Why?
Well, firstly workers are aware that the jewellery industry is dangerous and the pay is not great, so new workers are difficult to come by. Also, there is a labour shortage in southern China and jewellery factories are seriously affected. Therefore they pay some middlemen to go to inland [and relatively poor] provinces like Guizhou or Yunnan to look for youngsters and persuade them to work in Guangdong.

[For a report on a similar case, please click here]

What do you think of the work that the ICFTU does – for example in submissions to the ILO and the UN?
We haven’t read those reports, but we think they can be very useful, especially if those reports from ICFTU really reflect the truth. Because of strict control on reporters’ activities in China, the outside world may not get the full picture about the situation of Chinese workers’ and may under or over-state a particular problem or situation. But as long as ICFTU is telling the truth about the Chinese government and telling the Chinese government the truth, then in the long term, we believe it will make a difference. At least it will give them the impression that others are watching.

What else can the international labour movement help the Chinese workers?
We think apart from what you tell us it has been doing, the international union movement could try to advise the ACFTU on how to work better. This may not have an immediate positive response but we believe that with foreign unions watching, the ACFTU at least would not perform worse than it does now [and maybe will improve].

When was the first time you learned about independent trade unions?
Feng: In June 2005, the second time I came to Hong Kong. In addition to NGOs which offered me help, unions in HK also took part in the protest [HKCTU facilitated a press conference] and I really appreciated that. Since then I started to learn more about independent trade unions.

You said you were traveling around and meeting with workers, is there anything you want the international unions to do to assist you?
Yes. We would love to have some leaflets - in Chinese, of course. They can tell workers about labour rights and also give stories about the international labour movement. One problem for Chinese workers is that they cannot access this information in China freely, even though they would be interested to learn more. Also, if you have videos and other materials portraying the struggles of workers outside China, that would be also very useful.

Are you optimistic about the struggles of the Chinese workers’?
Yang: I am not very optimistic because the scale of the problem is just too big. But I am really glad that foreign media, unions and NGOs are so willing to help.
Feng: We have just started our work and I am not too pessimistic. We need more international exposure and also we need to give Chinese workers more confidence to voice out their struggles.

Do you have any thoughts about when the Chinese government may ratify the ILO Conventions 87 and 98 [on freedom of association and collective bargaining]?
Yang: In two or three years.
Feng: No idea… one day but not that soon.

Background:

Yang Renping: Previously a migrant worker and stonecutter at Lucky Gems and Jewellery Company’s Shenzhen Plant from the mid-1980s to early 1990s. He fell ill and returned to his hometown in Sichuan and only found out he was suffering from silicosis in late 1990s. When he returned to Lucky Gems to demand compensation, he discovered the factory had moved to another city in Guangdong Province, Huizhou shortly after he had left the factory and when he came back, the factory denied he was once their worker. He lodged a compensation claim and protested to the local government and even visited Beijing to complain to the ACFTU, but he did not receive anything. In February 2005, when he and other silicosis-affected workers came to Hong Kong to protest at the factory’s headquarters, it was the first time the factory owner agreed to talk with them. He then received a one-off compensation of 200,000 Yuan, a figure far less than what he needs to treat the illness. He is currently traveling town to town in Guangdong Province to educate other workers on the importance of occupational health and safety.

Feng Xingzhong: In 1993, Feng Xingzhong, at the age of 18, entered Ko Ngar Gems Factory Limited’s factory in Huizhou City as a stonecutter. In May 2000, after the factory’s medical checkup, a factory manager informed Feng that he had contracted tuberculosis [a disease not related to the jewellery industry and hence one which would absolve the factory of any legal obligation to compensation] and told him to take sick leave. In 2002, realizing that he had been cheated by the factory and wasted two years in curing an illness that he did not have, Feng lodged a compensation claim at the Labour Disputes Arbitration Committee in Haifeng County, where the factory had by then relocated under a new name - Gaoyi Factory. Mrs Feng, who also worked in the same factory, was sacked as a result of her husband’s claim for compensation. His claim was then rejected on the grounds that he had exceeded the 60-day time limit for such claims and since then – up until now, Feng has been running between courts at various locations, traveling to HK to protest at jewellery exhibitions and also demanding compensation from the Hong Kong based owners. Like Yang, Feng has also be openly brave in visiting different factories to see if he can be of help to other workers and in talking in several press conferences about the jewellery workers’ stories, in order to get more people to be aware of the blood-stained history behind the jewels.

----------------
January 2006

IHLO

© Copyright 2006 :: All Rights Reserved